That’s actually a much more balanced take—and I respect that you laid out your full reasoning. You’ve clearly stayed in for evolving catalysts over time, and now it comes down to the legal outcome and potential strategic endgame. That said, your own post highlights something important: despite all the concerns you’ve raised over the years, you’re still here holding Amarin Corporation, which tells me you see asymmetric upside from these levels.
But then it raises a fair question—if you believe downside is limited, cash is stable, ex-U.S. scripts are growing, and there’s still a realistic path to a $1.5B+ outcome, why consistently emphasize the negatives so heavily in your posts? Is that just caution, or are you trying to shape sentiment while positioning?
Because at this stage, it’s less about revisiting past disappointments and more about what happens next—and right now, with legal, strategic, and potential M&A angles all in play, the setup looks a lot more constructive than your tone suggests.
Are you intentionally spreading FUD to walk the price down so you can keep averaging your position lower?