News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ilovetech

03/29/26 12:43 PM

#819745 RE: ilovetech #819744

Edit:

The LSE tested the recovery systems yesterday for a reason

icon url

beachhyena

03/29/26 1:21 PM

#819746 RE: ilovetech #819744

Appreciate the updates ILT and for those who need additional DD and validate his remarks go ahead and study in detail the following.

I will be updating the new Synthetic Short Position tomorrow as the next reveal (bi-weekly occurred on Friday).

TRADEchoMiFIDIIPostTradeFIXSpecification
icon url

Baxers

03/29/26 2:29 PM

#819755 RE: ilovetech #819744

How do you explain that Broker Code 098 (also referred to as a Broker ID in some contexts - that functions as a participant identifier within the CREST Courier and Sorting Service) is presently not assigned to ANY company. Here is today's most up-to-date list:
https://docs.londonstockexchange.com/website/Outgoing/MemberFirmCodes.xls

While 098 used to be assigned to RBC Europe Limited at one time and then finnCap Ltd at another time, it is presently not assigned to ANY company.

In fact furthermore, CREST does support processes for removing (deleting) securities positions or entries pursuant to court orders (e.g., in cases of insolvency, winding-up, rectification of the register, or enforcement actions). These are handled through specific instruction types, messages (e.g., certain deletion or cancellation messages), or manual interventions coordinated with EUI, registrars, and legal teams. CREST uses structured messaging with defined fields for transaction type, reason codes, participant IDs, and settlement instructions. Participant IDs (like 098) are distinct from any settlement-layer suffixes or special processing codes. Mixing a Broker ID into a settlement-layer suffix for deletions/ reconciliations would be operationally confusing and contrary to how the system separates participant identification from transaction processing logic.

Why did the LSE conduct a ASR test yesterday you ask? Because routine annual ASR maintenance of the LSE on a Saturday around now is completely normal. In fact, here is the test history from the last 5 years:
Saturday, 28 March 2026
Saturday, 29 March 2025
Saturday, 3 February 2024
Saturday, 4 February 2023
Saturday, 5 February 2022

So, you found nothing... literally nothing! You found a test date that was 100% identical last year and very very similar for the 3 years before that. Correlation does not equal causation! Quit with the imaginary dot connecting. Wasn't it just ~4-5 weeks ago that you were claiming another such LSE maintenance event was definitely linked to NWBO and that the very next day we should see your imaginary $1.71 flash up... more BS... more can kicking... more utter feckin nonsense!
icon url

Investor082

03/29/26 10:36 PM

#819795 RE: ilovetech #819744

No excuses when LP continues to dilute in pennies throughout 2026, OK? ;)