Now you’ve gone completely off the rails (surprise).
A qui tam/False Claims Act case is filed under seal and served on the U.S. Attorney and Attorney General through specific DOJ procedures, not casually mentioned in a proof of service like this.
If this were actually a qui tam action: – It would be filed under seal – The government would be given time to intervene – You wouldn’t see it playing out like a normal civil case on the docket
That’s not what this is.
What we actually have is simple:
The docket shows: – U.S. Attorney NOT served – Attorney General NOT served – Missing documentation
That’s a failed or incomplete service attempt. Nothing more.
You’re inventing a whistleblower narrative to explain away a basic procedural issue.
This isn’t “serious money.” It’s sloppy litigation. You're incredibly biased.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
