Asia Broadband Inc (AABB)

[NotTheRealBeeny]

Now you’ve gone completely off the rails (surprise).

A qui tam/False Claims Act case is filed under seal and served on the U.S. Attorney and Attorney General through specific DOJ procedures, not casually mentioned in a proof of service like this.

If this were actually a qui tam action:
– It would be filed under seal
– The government would be given time to intervene
– You wouldn’t see it playing out like a normal civil case on the docket

That’s not what this is.

What we actually have is simple:

The docket shows:
– U.S. Attorney NOT served
– Attorney General NOT served
– Missing documentation

That’s a failed or incomplete service attempt. Nothing more.

You’re inventing a whistleblower narrative to explain away a basic procedural issue.

This isn’t “serious money.”
It’s sloppy litigation.
You're incredibly biased.

🤣 🤣 🐒 🤡