News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tseven

02/27/26 11:35 AM

#446329 RE: TastyTheElf #446328

Could be wrong but I have never seen any mention by the company or read in an analyst report. All from this board . The patent app of course has been filed but I do not remember amrn mentioning that either
icon url

JRoon71

02/27/26 11:46 AM

#446330 RE: TastyTheElf #446328

TTE, no, I have not heard anything from the company on the new formulation. Really just deductive reasoning - the company is struggling and suffering, we have massive generic competition, we lost our patent, we have a new formulation that is potentially better, cheaper, and a lower pill burden, they have submitted for patent protection, and they need a way to gain back the US market regardless of legal outcome. Also, it's not some "pie in the sky" idea, like a combo pill. It's a small modification to the existing formula that makes it far better.

All of that is what gives me confidence that the new formulation is the future of this product.
icon url

SovereignNinja5

02/27/26 12:19 PM

#446332 RE: TastyTheElf #446328

Amarin the entity has never discussed the new methods of use and reformulation patent. That is 100% retail investigated. Under Karim and Per they were the ones going down the Fixed Dose Combination path and stated it in a 10K/Q. Some work had been done but that direction is/was a low hanging fruit path which is why those two idiots chose it. There is a specific FDA guidance for it (FDC) and it’s not a proper path for lifecycle management of a lost patent and gives you minimum in return. Holt/Sarissa stopped this immediately. Sarissa and his team with the CSO knows the FDA codified regulations as well as the patent path which is probably why he declared the asset as undervalued and has quietly executed it. The rub is if they’ve done the required work for the submission once they get the patent in hand. If they met with the FDA in a formal meeting prior and there was a mapped out path between the two then this gets better. My assumption is they have which is why they had a citizens petition filed at FDA for fenofibrates. They still need and want the USA market so they can keep this model with the PBM’s. Having the CVD IFU and a new method of use/formulation changes the infringement game. It also changes the generic game. The plan with the step therapy and triglycerides is another game because the use of an authorized generic they keep talking about as a potential use is another bucket of opportunity.