It’s one thing to have a theory and admit it’s a theory and may very well not happen. Gary for example puts a lot of positive stuff out there but to his credit, he always hems and haws and qualifies what he says so much that his material does not really raise false hopes and while it can annoy us embittered types who know better, it is not harmful to investors as such.
Like what QAnon did to many people, what ILT is doing by claiming secret knowledge (like Q did) and constructing an alternative reality for already desperate NWBO shareholders is harmful. Once someone gets radicalized and sucked into an alternative worldview they’re in trouble and have difficulty making objective decisions about whether to buy, hold or sell.
Again we’re not talking about somebody just sharing their opinion, something we’re all familiar with.
ILT claimed to be able to show us the proof and instead of vindicating himself, acts like it’s our fault they won’t do so because we demanded extraordinary evidence for not just extraordinary theories but what ILT claimed were facts that could be proven if only they designed to show us how.
If I am wrong about my criticisms then ILT can prove it as they claimed they could.
If they don’t want to do that, then can give a reasonable date no later than which we will see the vault stuff fully. reflected in the SP of our brokerage account shares.
If ILT refuses to do either one, move past your hatred of me and ask whether objetive these challenges are reasonable and ones you would make, albeit more deferentially.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
