Jeez, weak arguments/ counterpoints. Pattern and Practice and A Preponderance / more believable than not.
Read the 168 exhibits, post them and provide analytics. Otherwise you are countering without any informed or educated basis. And that makes your posts/ings flimsy and feeble bashing.= WEAK.
No, it isn't DUI court, and you know nothing about being an attorney. Being suspended for a month on three occasions for violations is a mere slap on the wrist, and doesn't conclude incompetent. That is merely sounding off as usual.
You are providing weak counterpoints, having no relevant details of how that equates to lack of experience. Read the complaint and consider if it written effectively and competently. It is and does. In anticipation of the motion to dismiss, Applebaum included 168 pages of evidentiary exhibits, to ensure that the complaint would survive such a Motion. You know next to nothing, but still sound off and bash.= WEAK.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
