News Focus
News Focus
icon url

condor1

01/26/26 2:59 PM

#117814 RE: NotTheRealBeeny #117805

Beeny: While I understand that you post pertinent and intelligent information, it would be even better if you post the supporting documentation that you base your postions, opinions and beliefs on.
In ways your information is more than mine. But, you seemingly have a bias, in which all of your information is against AABB, by in large.
As such, posting the supporting info provides an unbiased set of documentation.
When I see Short whatever, I conclude tha5t there is substantial shortig, of which is, seemingly , the basis for the lawsuit, manipulating and driving down the share price.
Accordingly, why is the shorting ,according to you, as non-existant, especially, in light of the lawsuit AND the 168 pages of evidence of such shorting/ market maker manipulation. WHAT EXACTLY is meant by 58% short interest, if not shorting by hidden ghost shares? Please provide documentary support of your position.
icon url

condor1

01/26/26 3:50 PM

#117821 RE: NotTheRealBeeny #117805

Basic Stats
Short Interest 532 shares - source: FINRA
Short Interest Ratio 1.00 Days to Cover
Short Interest % Float 0.00 % - source: FINRA (short interest), Capital IQ (float)
Off-Exchange Short Volume 34,387,192 shares - source: FINRA (inc. Dark Pool volume)
Off-Exchange Short Volume Ratio 58.48 % - source: FINRA (inc. Dark Pool volume).

See Beeny, had you posted the finra stats, you would have included the OFF EXCHANGE SHORT VOLUME AND RATIO NUMBERS. You know darn well that OFF EXCHANGE = EUROPE SHORTING and there is no enforcement of such European SHORTING.
THUS, you knowingly and willfully have misrepresented the true and accurate facts, and WHY? Perhaps, you may be BIASED in your attack against AABB???? C'mon, guy, post the truth, not the selected half truths. I expect you to post the truth, and suppport it by posting the documented facts.