Replies to post #216090 on MultiCorp International Inc (MCIC)

[4u2nv2]

That is a good question but I have a similar question. What if "there comes a time" when MCIC starts to question why 40 Brightwater has not deposited the funds in an account that MCIC controls and completed all these transactions? Maybe they did? Maybe they did not? I do not have an opinion because we do NOT know all of the facts. But I seriously doubt that a publicly traded company would expose itself to the liability of not delivering their obligations to said party "40 Brightwater" that was investing "the kind of numbers" mentioned in the news last year. This is purely a speculative theory on my part because someone needs to start asking some questions. We can agree on that. So for the first time in my posting history - I am not positive or negative on whats up here. 100% clueless based on the public facts available to us. Rumors are irrelevant and I have not heard any in many years. So, it's not that game being played.

The MCIC question we all want to know is - - "Wassup?"

[boobb2]

AKFISH...................

A letter of intent (LOI) is generally not legally binding, but it can become enforceable if the language or context suggests a firm commitment. The document's wording and the history of dealings between the parties often determine whether it’s binding. Courts have sometimes enforced LOIs when they clearly outlined essential terms or when one party relied on them in good faith. To avoid unintended obligations, parties should use clear non-binding language and specify which sections, if any, are meant to be legally enforceable..........So we don't know the language or context of the letter of intent........so just have to wait

The PR news had mentioned A Letter of Intent

[4u2nv2]

I think there comes a time when our boy at "40 Brightwater" - LLC to be specific. Faces a class action lawsuit by the MCIC shareholders for failing to provide the funding during which time news was announced by this boy's partners. Furthermore resulting in the CE designation that harmed long term existing shareholders in the publicly traded entity. Which outlines the text book example of why shareholders have the right to file a class action lawsuit. You want a link? Here it is.

How many MCIC shareholder would be interested in discussing a class action lawsuit against this boy at "40 Brightwater LLC" that failed to deliver on the funding? It can be discussed right here publicly or most know how to contact me privately.

Defend 40 Brightwater and accuse MCIC for being the blame of the CE one more time like that >>>>>>>>

Here is wassup homeboy. The real MCIC shareholders are tired of rap music. We want to sign a petition against that also.