Replies to post #138470 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[chazzy1]

That is a succinct and accurate historical summary of where we are today. Let's hope and pray that Judge Moss will be fair and unbiased. If he is, VPLM's best days lie just ahead. GLTA!

[DeerBalls]

$.0118 You've been here far less than ten years, BUT the A.I. should do better: Michelle Lee was the Director of the USPTO, not just a supervisor. She was the head, top dog! That might have been OK, but she had A HUGE holding in googl at the same time...a slight tilting of the scales might result? AHHHH, NO DOUBT!

judge lucy koh(on the ninth circuit now🫣) did not say, "I hate patent companies."; she wasn't quite that stupid! She said, "This is why I hate patent cases.". Most would infer a bias against patent companies from this statement.... I watched lucy's confirmation hearing to the Ninth Circuit...accomplished, BUT NOT A BRIGHT WOMAN!

Is that aapl buyout still coming????

One of Dr. Jordan Peterson's rules, "Be precise with your words!".

https://ipwatchdog.com/2021/08/10/patent-owner-sues-former-uspto-officials-improperly-stacking-deck/

A little history lesson for those here less than ten years. Michele Lee was a supervisor at the PTAB/Patent Office

Lucy Koh continued the favoritism for Big Business. She ruled Alice against our patents in favor of defendants and once made the statement in open court, " I hate patent companies".

[DeerBalls]

$.0118 You don't seem to be too consistent(I could show many more negative posts)!? I've been on here going on 13 years, NEARLY 14,000 POSTS, every post supportive of Emil/Rich/the TEAM, BECAUSE I BELIEVE IN THEM, and the cause. Oh, no LIES, either!

You?

See, I don't mind banter, it's how I was raised...as a broker, it's nearly constant! BRING IT, it's a game!

I have a good relationship with Rich, Emil, Dennis...and I'm glad! I'm proud of what they've accomplished! MORE COMING!

Show me where I've dogged VPLM, or not supported VPLM holders in the big picture.....

prophet2 Tuesday, December 09, 2025 2:21:27 PM
DB, glad to see you back. I was hoping you could answer a serious question for me. Ihub, under detailed quotes, marks the trades as Buy or Sell. Since, as we know, there is always a seller and a buyer how do they differentiate buys from sells. Like today there is lot more buyers than sellers based on their numbers. tia, the Prophet

prophet2 Friday, January 16, 2026 12:37:02 PM
Well it was nice while it lasted. A month of positive gains all but wiped out in three days of trading. Going to sub one cent, again, seems all but inevitable. Can not wait for DB's later post telling us how all is still good and this decline is good because it got all the weak hands out. BTW DB, tell us what Rich could be doing that is keeping him so busy . The company is between filings (which the lawyers would handle anyways), there are no settlement discussions or anything else positive going on which could move the pps in the short term and keep Rich busy. So we sit back and wait for Moss' decision on the Motion to Dismiss and hope that it goes in our favor. the Prophet

[rapz]

>>...So what kind of Judge will Moss turn out to be?...<<
That is one question every post has raised so far... Will Moss hold the defendants accountable for the criminal violations of Sherman Act and provide a resolution for us? Blocking VPLM from accessing the smart phone infrastructure and implementing a stand-alone WiFi technology is direct evidence for the crimes of monopolistic practice, according to Sherman Act. Even a hand-written note on a piece of paper is a sufficient, legal evidence of the crime. VPLM was harmed by this crime over several years! Who would consider a motion to cancel in defendant's favor? When charged, it is common for a criminal to plead not guilty. The case is about proving their guilt using several direct evidences in black and white; we have the direct evidence of blocking, colluding, deceptive selling, software manipulation by device manufactures (APPL, GOOG LLC, Alphabet, SamSung), etc.

Moss' case history shows several deportation cases of immigrants, not much on AntiTrust or Class Action.

The old long time-line in terms of 10 years had to do with patent infringement cases, 36 IPR's, 1 rexam of RBR patent, current rexam of MG patent and two Appeals NDCal. All these years of IPR's and negative rulings by court's inept, clueless, arrogant judges in patent infringement cases. US patent law is simple but the infringers have a lot of room for excuses, misdirection, lies, etc. Defendants could afford to be arrogant, but not now, in AntiTrust case exposing them to ciminal violations under Sherman Act, which spells out penalties, treble damages, and even a jail term.

The new time-line started in 2024 with the filing of Antitrust and Class Action cases. We have filed, refiled, consolidated once and finalized filings in late 2025. That is our new time-line.

These filings seek a resolution of several issues, including some patent conflicts. The Antitrust is simple and straight forward. The Class Action is complex (Refer to a diagram posted eariler) and could take longer, considering the illegality of Subscribers' Arbitration Clause and deceptive selling of expensive calling plans etc.

[sunspotter]

I'm afraid almost none of that is true, except that VPLM lost its suits in front of Koh and Albright..

Given that VPLM is indefensible, I suppose you have to embroider the truth, but this is pretty poor.

The truth:

"Has not resigned
Judge Lucy Koh has not resigned. She was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on December 14, 2021, after serving as a district judge from 2010 to 2021. Her service as a federal appellate judge continues, and there is no indication of her resignation from this position."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Koh