Replies to post #804907 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[Investor082]

He is going to brag about averaging down again in 2026. In between, he will plead for low share price to persist for a few more days so he could buy more, LOL! ;)

[DocLee]

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, Smitty takes the biscuit!!! The only thing that is "absurd" in his critique of Danish Dude's comments is his own assessment itself. Smitty is palpably incorrect that DD has been "wrong at every corner" and he should follow his own advice to "..do a deep, hard look into the mirror"

[The Danish Dude]

Smitty5150, Fireman02532, Fireman23060, Awj23060 or whatever burner account you’re using today to sell crazy. You have flip flop’ed so many times, whined about lawsuits, complaints, petitions, and being completely wrong on Advent Bioservices and Linda Powers as have all the hard- and closet bashers.

I have been wrong about a lot of date predictions. Guilty as charged.

But in the end. Am I wrong about what will happen? And a lot that have happened?

I have been debunking bear nonsense consistently, yours included and knowing your history and your "setups", I know what to look for in your posts, when you try to steer sentiment without looking to conspicous.

I have been right about a lot. I was right about ATL-DC being DCVax-L three years ago and till this day I still take paid shills to school in the topic. I am right in the ORR endpoints debate. I am right in my debunking of the trial design, endpoint, external control FUD garbage critique. I was right about Linda Powers not having build Advent as a private self enrichment project.

And then there’s a lot of stuff, which are still up for the jury to decide, because those developments are to be seen AFTER approval.

But what you don’t seem to understand is, that for the most part, my interest participating on this board and X is not to be right, but to dig up information, due diligence, put forward pro’s and con’s, argue this and that and try to correlate the big picture.

I have no interest arguing for an approval if data, events and actions didn’t support it.

I have no interest arguing for Linda Powers actions, if they didn’t make sense in the light of a decade long manipulation scheme.

Is this RIGHT?

APPGBT -> Linda Powers testimony -> APPGBT report -> recommendations for MHRA and NICE to approve and reimburse -> External Controls Guidance -> SI87 law -> NICE reimbursement medical device

It’s putting forward a chain of events that seems to be logically connected and which can reasonably be argued is of positive significance to NWBO. It’s probabilities.

That’s my interest. Of course I will be wrong on topics. I argued for Flaskworks Eden being in MAA application. I got some essentials wrong. Eden can still be in the MAA, but in another way.

Flipper caught an error I and many made about “50% of expected death events” regarding SurVaxM ASCO abstract. Which I confirmed and then changed for the analysis.

In my AI learning days, I fell into AI’s problems with verbatim quotes. I owned that.

I admit if I am wrong, because contrary to paid shills, my bias is not paid for - and thus have to be defended at any cost, no matter how stupid that makes me look. My bias is a simple result of “more pro’s or more con’s”?

The Czech trial, the results, the significance to NWBO?

It’s incredibly how this have gone overlooked, considering the documentation and proof.

Yet another topic, where right and wrong is to be found out further down the road.

There will be plenty to find out. Some, like Kevin Duffy’s engagement, might never be exposed. Or they might.

You know what I see,when I take a deep hard look in the mirror?



That’s how it is with credibility.

PS: Thanks DocLee 🙏🏻