News Focus
News Focus
icon url

alm2

12/27/25 1:21 AM

#443707 RE: Denisk #443705

Amarin/hikma/settlement/trial-??? value???
We need to consider things from different perspectives /scenarios assuming we get past the SC which is almost certain
Summary judgement -not going to happen -this will go to trial -judge Andrews granting summary judgement-???? no way
Trial or settlement ? What would Hikma offer ? Leave market yes -value 50million maybe -100m?no chance -settlement benefit trial risk out for both parties yes some cash on settlement Amarin and one generic out
Amarin will prefer trial - ??? evidence seemingly strong on infringement -value much greater from jury -200mill -250 m -will they go bigger most unlikely -but no cash in bank because of appeal process lasting many years -and or Hikma unable to pay ?? Hikma would leave market yes-
The real achievable benefit from trial would be as Sleven has simply explained getting an outcome as to all generics out as per approach adopted in gsk v Teva -possibility
But reality of trial success It’s a no significant cash reward for years scenario otherwise
Whilst Hikma are on the run we must look at outcomes that are possible /likely
It is on any view positive for Amarin but key to price movement remains on quarterly profitable performance -and other catalysts also possible
Alm
icon url

TastyTheElf

12/27/25 8:47 AM

#443713 RE: Denisk #443705

As I said awhile back, Barclays will finally have something useful to do.

Because the relevant calculations now aren't about how much the damages could be -- whatever they are, it's more than Hikma could ever pay.

The relevant calculations are either (1) what can Hikma afford and still be a viable going concern, or (2) what level of damages is Amarin likely to recover in a Hikma Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Those are banker calculations.