News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TastyTheElf

12/26/25 11:42 AM

#443639 RE: mrmainstreet #443637

my guess is that the facts were very different in that case. All they were doing was mindless drug substitution.

In Hikma's case it's malicious, willful infringement inducement.
icon url

Number sleven

12/26/25 12:11 PM

#443650 RE: mrmainstreet #443637

MRM, If you remember, the judge refused our motion to severe. We couldn't appeal the dismissal until the Health Net suit was concluded. That may have played a role in the settlement.
Sleven,