News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Number sleven

12/26/25 10:44 AM

#443619 RE: golf stud #443617

Golf stud, I have no idea what the share price will do. I would certainly expect it to go up substantially.
Sleven,
icon url

TastyTheElf

12/26/25 10:46 AM

#443620 RE: golf stud #443617

Can someone remind me what the go-forward patent coverage is for the US (REDUCE-IT)?

I see expirations in 2030 and 2033. Which year governs?
icon url

marzan

12/26/25 10:56 AM

#443622 RE: golf stud #443617

Yes, absolutely positively quite possible! A Hikma loss would be more than a legal footnote for Amarin Corporation — it would be a narrative shock. The moment litigation fog lifts, AMRN flips from “distressed battleground stock” to a clean, cash-generating global cardiovascular franchise with stabilized U.S. economics and growing ROW momentum. In that setup, even a credible takeover rumor — not a deal, just interest — is enough to ignite a violent squeeze, given the asymmetric positioning, low float, and years of bearish consensus. Big pharma doesn’t need Vascepa to be perfect; it just needs to be predictable, and a Hikma defeat delivers exactly that. A strategic buyer paying $5–10B for a de-risked, globally scaled CV asset with lifecycle optionality is entirely rational — and the market will front-run that possibility long before any press release hits. In this tape, perception moves faster than fundamentals, and once the bear thesis breaks, price discovery won’t be polite.
icon url

rosemountbomber

12/26/25 11:07 AM

#443627 RE: golf stud #443617

I could easily see $20 pre split numbers, if the Generics were gone.  What I am not so sure as far as how easy it would is getting of ALL the Generics.  Getting rid of only Hikma accomplishes little. Remember the 26 was that aftermarket high on the heels of approval for cvd and then settled for a while around 20 before the pre Du jitters took it down to 13.