News Focus
News Focus
icon url

FranCoRazon

12/25/25 5:03 AM

#227929 RE: walterc #227928

Don’t waste any of your precious time on this PoS Walter. We know his lack of integrity and how sick in the brain he is. Let’s spend our energy on the ones that deserve it and on the blooming and flowering state of our company that will flourish in 2026 and beyond.

Merry christmas and all the best for next year to you and all other longtime investors.

🥂 🎄 🎆
icon url

prototype_101

12/25/25 8:02 AM

#227933 RE: walterc #227928

Walter said, Hypocrisy is the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform. Essentially, it is preaching one thing but doing another.

teddybear has been spewing nothing but lies and deceptions here from day one when he rolled out of the kerridale klown kar and started a campaign quoting from a report that was summarily REBUKED in an SEC filed document, so it is incredibly hard to ever trust anything he posts here, but that being said, if teddybear has had an epiphany of the truths that I have been posting here to combat his never ending total BS stream of nonsense posts, then I would say this would have to be considered a true Christmas miracle, and all praise an honor goes to God above!! Merry Christmas!!

and so as we move into 2026 let's just see if teddybear stays true to his promise here, Let’s look forward in togetherness and hope for the best.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177102337
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

tedpeele

12/25/25 10:55 AM

#227937 RE: walterc #227928

Walter, your post today confused me because you told the board you would prove the PR wasn’t about Nokia, and then you didn’t provide that proof. All I did was point out that you made a commitment and didn’t follow through — that’s not hypocrisy on my part.

When you later said you couldn’t reveal your source, I acknowledged that was your choice and that your frustration was understandable. The reason I said you should be embarrassed is that you escalated that issue pretty aggressively while criticizing me, and then didn’t follow through after all.

My point was simply that making claims that can’t be verified leaves everyone stuck.

I haven’t promised anything I failed to do, so I don’t see how hypocrisy applies here.

I don’t hold anything against you, and I understand now why sharing your source ended up being problematic for you. I think - and you may agree - that the source is very wrong to take the position that they do, although I understand why they do so.

In any case, it’s not worth further argument.

Let’s move on.

Merry Christmas.