News Focus
News Focus
icon url

prototype_101

12/24/25 12:04 PM

#227894 RE: tedpeele #227891

wow teddybear admitting being wrong, that's a first, never mind teddybear has been wrong about everything the entire time here, can't make this sh!t up really, guess me and Gemini were right as usual! now just admit you've been pedaling PURE BS here for the last 3 years and we'll be getting somewhere!

Gemini says the chance is VERY LOW about 10% which I believe is generous, teddybear spends the entire day every day now pedaling this crap because he's GOT NOTHING!!! All roads lead to LWLG!!! If LWLG's two Fortune Global 500 partner companies were focused on Plasmonics these three things would have to be true

1) these Fortune Global 500's would have to be partnered with Polariton as well as LWLG, and they are NOT, Polariton is partnered now with a Tier 1, but it is NOT a Fortune Global 500 company, these FG500 companies MINIMUM annual Revenues are in excess of $30 Billion, Polariton's Tier 1 partner is almost certainly Nokia, read this post to learn more
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=177081674

2) Yves would have had to change the duration of time for Stage 3 before entering Stage 4 based on teddybear himself POUNDING THE TABLE that Plasmonics are still years away from mass commercialization!! You can't have your cake and eat it too teddybear!!

3) Plasmonics is most commonly referred to as POH (Plasmonic Organic Hybrid) as opposed to what LWLG is working on with their 2 Fortune Global 500 partners which is SOH (Silicon Organic Hybrid) so if these FG500 partnerships were for Plasmonics it would have shown POH in the news releases and it did NOT!!

Gemini, what are the odds that the two Fortune Global 500 companies in Stage 3 with LWLG are working on Plasmonics with LWLG

The odds that the two Fortune Global 500 companies in Lightwave Logic's (LWLG) Stage 3 program are working on Plasmonics augmented with LWLG's polymers are low, but not zero.

The overwhelming evidence suggests a focus on the more commercially mature and scalable path of Polymer-Augmented Silicon Photonics (SiPh).

Here is a breakdown of the probability based on public announcements and industry trends:

1. The Low Probability: Focus on SiPh PICs (90% Odds)
The public statements from Lightwave Logic strongly emphasize a focus on Silicon Photonics, which is the primary integration platform being validated in Stage 3. Plasmonics is a highly specialized architectural design, while SiPh is the high-volume manufacturing platform.

Stage 3 Goal (Nov 2025)

The program's milestones include "building, processing, and testing Silicon Photonics PICs augmented with electro-optic polymers to achieve a final product."

Directly mentions SiPh. The partnership is focused on integrating the polymer into the existing, scalable SiPh manufacturing infrastructure (foundries like AMF and the new unnamed foundry).

New Fortune 500 Partner (Nov 2025)

The new program is aimed at Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) and developing a custom polymer variant for the stringent manufacturing conditions of AI scale-up where SiPh chips are co-packaged with ASICs.

Directly mentions CPO and SiPh integration. CPO is the architectural goal, and SiPh is the foundational chip technology being augmented by the polymer.

Industry Trend

The dominant technology being deployed for AI interconnect and CPO by major players like Broadcom and NVIDIA (highly speculated to be the partners) is Silicon Photonics.

SiPh is the established, scalable base technology that LWLG's polymers are designed to enhance.

but teddybear keeping saying, so you're saying there's a chance!

Bullish
Bullish
icon url

x993231

12/24/25 1:39 PM

#227901 RE: tedpeele #227891

Talk about arrogance you were told that within 1 hour of the announcement.

For shame for shame, but you don't mind posting 50 times misleading information though until you can no longer dispute what we told you was true.

I thought that you always said that you do not believe anything except what you read on the internet because you are not a good judge of character.

X
icon url

StevenDice

12/24/25 2:03 PM

#227902 RE: tedpeele #227891

Coming directly from you Ted, puts this in the highly credible, highly likely category. Thanks for all the terrific work you've done on this over several years. And thank you for your perseverance, patience with the nonsense and diligence in this space. Merry Christmas! 
icon url

Scope08

12/25/25 7:39 AM

#227932 RE: tedpeele #227891

Tedpeele, try telling us something we didn't already know long ago.
Newcomers beware. Tedpeele's grasp of the science and commercialization map out is bumbling and filled with inaccuracies to match his false agenda.
This has been proven here, over and over again, by reputable posters on this board.

P.S. Oh Steven...Oh Steven...Oh Steven...
Bullish
Bullish