In psychology often referred to the Ad Hominem….
Fallacy, where someone attacks the person delivering an argument (their character, motives) instead of the argument itself, or the "Shooting the Messenger Effect," blaming the bearer of bad news for the news itself, rooted in defense mechanisms, fear, or misdirected anger, rather than logic.
Psychologically, these tactics avoid addressing uncomfortable truths, using personal attacks or blame to dismiss valid information, often because the messenger's perceived traits (like being a "hippie communist" or a "seditious lawyer") trigger emotional responses that override rational consideration of the message.
Types & Examples
Ad Hominem (To the Man): Attacking the person's character, background, or traits to discredit their argument.
Example: Dismissing a scientist's climate research because they once got a speeding ticket.
Shooting the Messenger: Blaming the person who brings bad news, rather than the source of the bad news.
Example: Yelling at a financial advisor for reporting a market downturn, even though they just delivered the information.
Psychological Reasons
Defense Mechanisms: It's easier to lash out at the messenger than to confront a difficult reality (e.g., a poor financial report, a serious health warning).
Emotional Response: Personal attacks or bad news trigger strong emotions (anger, fear, distrust), which can hijack logical thinking.
Cognitive Biases: People may judge the message based on their impression of the messenger (expertise, trustworthiness, motives) rather than the message's merit.
Sense-Making: Blaming someone can be a way to create order or blame in a chaotic situation, providing a simple explanation.
“Today” has never been the day for SFRX. If one reads the reports to the state as well as the research they’ve complied, it’s quite obvious why “today” has never been the day and likely never will.
Happy Monday!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
