Negative yet very factual comments are what you get when you consistently lie on this board. The "bashers" here are truth tellers. You're a proven liar.
The term "Digital Clarity Intelligence Engine" does not refer to a single, specific, widely-recognized product or technology name, but rather a descriptive phrase used by several companies to describe their proprietary AI-powered analytics or intelligence platforms.
The company is still running at a loss. They posted a net loss for the year, which means they’re not even breaking even at this tiny scale. On top of that, the filing openly states there is substantial doubt about their ability to continue operating at all. That’s not my wording that’s in their own disclosure.
They also reported zero cash on hand. Not “low cash.” Not “tight liquidity.” Zero. A public company running with no cash is already waving a red flag before you even get to the rest.
They admit they have not generated positive cash flow from operations and that the only way forward is to keep raising money from officers or third parties. In other words, the business doesn’t sustain itself it survives only if someone keeps writing checks.
Revenue was a tiny $35,000 for the year. That’s barely enough to cover basic overhead. There’s still no operating infrastructure either: no employees, everything outsourced, nothing resembling a scalable business internally.
The accumulated deficit is over $12 million, and the only real financing tool they’ve used historically is issuing shares. Investors already know what that means: more dilution any time they need cash, which is basically always.
Even their website isn’t maintained correctly the company admits it shows zero revenue by mistake. If they can’t keep the most basic public-facing information accurate, that’s not exactly a vote of confidence in their execution.
And finally, they admit they have no marketing program in place. No marketing means no pipeline and no growth. They’re essentially running on fumes and future promises.
When you put all of this together, the picture is pretty simple: A company with no cash, no employees, minimal revenue, ongoing losses, heavy dilution risk, and an accumulated deficit in the eight figures while also questioning its own ability to keep operating.
If someone wants to spin that as “strong,” they’re welcome to try… but the disclosure itself tells a very different story.
Obviously "real shareholders" here need help in knowing what to believe from the company. Just last week you were telling everyone how well the company was doing. Did you even know they were about to admit they screwed up? I'm curious if you intentionally lied or are in the dark to what's going on over at the ol' PO BOX address.