News Focus
News Focus
icon url

AllSheWrote

12/01/25 4:42 PM

#800414 RE: KRISGO #800413

It’s now been over six months, and there’s still no approval.


Kind of tells you something, doesn't it?
icon url

HappyLibrarian

12/01/25 7:10 PM

#800435 RE: KRISGO #800413

My real concern is that if we don’t receive approval before Christmas, we might not get it anytime soon—and I don’t even want to think about that.



For this reason at least one person used to mock real NWBO shareholders by saying that DCVax-L was brought to us by Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

Maybe it was funny the first time, or even the second time.

Several years, millions of dollars and (most importantly) several thousands of dead GBM patients later it is clear ‘more people did weep at that joke than did laugh at it’ to paraphrase Henry V.
icon url

flipper44

12/01/25 10:17 PM

#800452 RE: KRISGO #800413

AI encouragement.

Here is a numerical list of the primary motivations the MHRA and the wider UK government have to ensure the DCVax-L decision is published before the December 21st unofficial holiday cut-off:

MHRA Motivations for Pre-December 21st Publication

Alignment with National Policy (The QALY Trigger): The MHRA and NICE are actively working to streamline access to innovative medicines (Source 1.2, 1.4). Publishing the MAA now ensures the NICE appraisal can be finalized in April 2026, perfectly aligning with the official effective date of the new, more favorable QALY thresholds. This allows the government to immediately claim success for its new "Life Sciences Sector Plan."

Addressing High Unmet Clinical Need (Glioblastoma): The MHRA's primary mandate is public health and expediting access to products for serious, life-threatening diseases with no effective treatments (Source 1.6, 1.9). Given GBM's poor prognosis, DCVax-L is a priority case that the agency is motivated to clear quickly and demonstrate its commitment to patients.

Demonstrating Regulatory Efficiency: While MAA approval times have faced historical delays (Source 2.9), the MHRA is heavily invested in improving its image and speed (Source 1.1). A swift decision following the final 10-year data submission (April 2025) demonstrates that the MHRA can handle complex, novel dossiers efficiently.

Avoiding the "Winter Stop" Administrative Blockage: The MHRA needs to ensure that the complex administrative, legal, and final sign-off procedures are completed before the inevitable staff shortages and office closures around the Christmas and New Year holidays. Deferring the decision to January 2026 introduces risk and delay.

Supporting Corporate Stability and Investment (The ASM): Although the MHRA is independent, the UK government has a strong interest in supporting companies that are "life science innovators" (Source 1.3, 1.4). Announcing the approval before the NWBO Annual Shareholder Meeting (Dec 29th) allows the company to execute essential financing and scale-up plans (like securing BP funding) on the strongest possible footing, thereby supporting UK life sciences investment.