News Focus
News Focus
icon url

KRISGO

12/01/25 4:29 PM

#800412 RE: FrostyIsland3 #800405

OR management needs to explain the reason for the delay and why we’re being impacted, especially since they’re requesting an additional 900 million shares. Imagine if the company has to dilute shares to cover all salaries—including Advent employees—and new manufacturing costs.
icon url

SkyLimit2022

12/01/25 5:07 PM

#800419 RE: FrostyIsland3 #800405

Frosty,

Thanks for the reply. I respect your perspective, but I would argue a couple points:

1. Authorized shares are not issued shares. They simply give management the option to issue shares if/when they need to. They’re shareholders too, so they won’t issue any of the authorized shares unless or until it’s necessary.

2. Our fuddy buddies scream about big industry partnerships, but those kinds of deals would be nearly impossible unless the company has the flexibility of readily available authorized shares…

I’m guessing big partners don’t like situations where they have to say…
“We want a 20% equity stake, but your shareholder vote won’t happen for 6–7 months.”

Yes, it is common & often necessary for a clinical-stage biotech to have a large pool of authorized shares on hand to preserve the possibility of major partnerships, equity-based collaborations, or acquisition friendly structures. NWBO increasing its authorized shares is consistent with preparing for those possibilities.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

learningcurve2020

12/01/25 5:44 PM

#800425 RE: FrostyIsland3 #800405

I’m hearing no crab cakes but she may just order a small deli tray incase anyone shows up.

>> I will vote no unless we get a positive response from the MHRA before the 2025 all shareholders' meeting.
icon url

brooktrail1933

12/01/25 9:52 PM

#800450 RE: FrostyIsland3 #800405

Dear Frosty,

I agree with ATLnsider's statement.
And I think that's why NWBO raised the OS limit.
My opinion.
icon url

montelo3go

12/01/25 10:46 PM

#800456 RE: FrostyIsland3 #800405

I agree with you 200%!!