News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Doc logic

11/29/25 3:37 PM

#800196 RE: sentiment_stocks #800195

sentiment_stocks,

Even initial demand would overwhelm if not for the IFR pathway being required until transition to Flaskworks is completed. Those 5 doctor panels are the spigot valve. They will determine most likely to benefit and speed of approved funding and they only have X amount of time before patient pressure overwhelms. Flaskworks and NICE reimbursement must be within striking distance of each other and IFR ability to fund until then to keep the IFR pathway for funding from being overwhelmed. Best wishes.
icon url

dennisdave

11/29/25 3:41 PM

#800197 RE: sentiment_stocks #800195

Good grief....

Large scale-up doesn’t avoid regulatory reality and the point Im making it defines it.
Once NWBO stated that Flaskworks/Grade C is central to commercial production, it became the intended commercial process, and under MHRA ATMP rules that process must be reviewed before an MA can be granted. NWBO’s own PR made clear that Flaskworks is prepared for regulatory licensing, not “in development” as you keep pretending. You can claim manual covers the initial demand, but MHRA does not approve based on temporary stopgaps they approve the actual commercial manufacturing route, so that narrative is pure fantasy.

Only on this board could ‘large scale-up’ somehow mean MHRA should review the smaller process instead. Good grief....

The moment NWBO said Flaskworks is central to large scale-up, manual stopped being eligible as the commercial basis for an MA it’s that simple.
icon url

AllSheWrote

11/29/25 7:24 PM

#800214 RE: sentiment_stocks #800195

Thanks. Since you are their iHub spokesperson, is this an official statement from the company?
icon url

exwannabe

12/03/25 7:30 AM

#800738 RE: sentiment_stocks #800195

Senti, when you get a chance can you ask DI about the vote mechanics on Q3?

It used to be that such a vote required a majority of outstanding shares. This law (DE) was changed a couple years ago to allow companies listed on a national exchange to use a simple majority of votes cast. But NWBO is on OTC (not a national exchange), so I would think this vote should require a majority of outstanding shares, but does not per the final proxy (was changed from the prelim).

We both know the vote will pass either way, so just curiosity is all.