A hoax? Well, then shame on JAMA if that number of conflicts would normally prohibit them from publishing? I have not researched that aspect of it but do you know? I was under the assumption that they couldn’t be bought but who really knows in this strange new publication environment?
You better tell the 🇺🇲 U.S. NIH & the 🇺🇲 U.S. Department of War that they invested in a “hoax” because they awarded independently peer-reviewed grants to develop the DC platforms at UCLA & Roswell that are currently licensed to NWBO.
You also might want to advise Dr. Liau who is a member of the SAB at NWBO, and Dr. Kalinski & Dr. Ashkan who are consultants for NWBO…
In fact, there’s a long list of individuals & institutions whom you might want to advise about this “hoax.” 🙄
I think you will see a “hoax” if you look here: Fact ✅️ Regarding the P3: Enrollment completed years before 2020, but patients continued to be treated & followed under the trial protocol as trial participants after enrollment closed. The P3 trial concluded in 2020, & data lock happened in Q4 of 2020…
Fact ✅️ Regarding Peer Review: Independently peer-reviewed validation continues to expand! The U.S. NIH 🇺🇸 & U.S. DoD (DoW) have awarded & renewed rigorously peer-reviewed grants to support DC technology…
Additionally, there was another peer-reviewed publication presented recently at the SITC Conference!
Regulatory agencies may choose to consider independently peer-reviewed publications as part of their overall analysis. The MAA review is just one of several regulatory reviews to come as NWBO is developing several technologies/products. The examples below are relatively recent publications & Dr. Kalinski is currently working on another paper.
Fact ✅ Regarding MHRA: The MHRA has already awarded several approvals, including their approval of the MIA (a prerequisite of the MAA) & their ongoing support of the DCVax-L Specials Program.