News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Stock_Barber

11/18/25 3:23 PM

#367172 RE: Poo28 #367169

So you ducked his simple question AGAIN 💩!

Zero credibility... just baseless accusations and cut and paste discredited garbage from the past!

What about your touted "Best year ever!" and "$1M+ in revenue!"?

Never to be acknowledged, eh?

The internet is forever...


icon url

Jetmek_03052

11/18/25 3:48 PM

#367174 RE: Poo28 #367169

Bullshit!

DBMM was confirmed as fully reporting and fully compliant.



DBMM was actually called out as NONCOMPLIANT by Corp Fins - in regard to the “Super 10K” filing. Corp Fins said the filing lacked the quarterly filing numbers for the time period the Super 10K covered. These numbers ARE SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT to be included in the “Super 10K” filing. They weren’t.

Crazy Foelack decided that the numbers “weren’t relevant” and apparently decided that it was forgivable. PLAINLY, Corp Fins and the division of Enforcement wanted them included.

So they “SEC” didn’t call DBMM compliant. Crazy Carol just decided to give DBMM “a pass” on the issue.
Bearish
Bearish
icon url

fung_derf

11/18/25 4:12 PM

#367179 RE: Poo28 #367169

Shareholders expect me to correct disinformation from non-shareholder



Interesting statement....why would shareholders expect you to do anything unless you're employed by the company?
icon url

THall

11/19/25 2:03 PM

#367215 RE: Poo28 #367169

You still haven’t produced a single quote from my post that was false. Not one.

Your entire reply is just another wall of recycled talking points that don’t address anything I actually said. You keep claiming “lies,” but when asked to copy/paste the exact line, you suddenly go silent and fall back on the same generic script. That alone proves the point.

You say shareholders expect you to correct “disinformation,” yet you can’t point to a single sentence I wrote that was inaccurate. If you actually had proof, you would have posted it. Instead, you just repeated your usual boilerplate.

You keep throwing out the 15c2-11 talking point like it changes anything. Delegated authority does not make OTC Markets equal to SEC reporting, and Pink Current does not mean “fully reporting.” Even OTCM’s own documentation makes that clear. But none of that even addresses what I wrote it’s just filler to avoid answering the question.

Calling people “bashers” every time someone asks for basic proof isn’t an argument. It’s a deflection, and it shows you have nothing else. You accuse people of manipulation while never producing a single fact to support your own claims.

So once again:

You said I lied so prove it.
Copy and paste the exact sentence from my post that you claim was false.

If you can’t do that , and clearly you can’t, then your reply is nothing more than noise meant to distract from the fact that you made a baseless accusation with zero proof.