News Focus
News Focus
icon url

seekinganswers

11/17/25 9:47 AM

#798123 RE: hankmanhub #798119

DI has already confirmed that is not the case.
icon url

dennisdave

11/17/25 10:31 AM

#798137 RE: hankmanhub #798119

Flipper, you gave this post a thumbs down. Which points exactly do you not agree with and on what basis?

Flipper doesnt like it that his ridiculous theory about 10 year data, that would somehow mean anything to NICE, is now in the garbage can where it always was.


And yes, by my calculations, November 6, 2025 means DCVax-l will have achieved 10.0 years past last patient’s initial randomization. Perhaps to the day.

George Z can probably honestly say he doesn’t know why things have taken quite this long, but amassing ten year data for any future NICE filing is my guess. Aka: No censoring required for all complete ten year data.

NICE doesn’t give a crap about some random number tied to the last patient’s initial randomization. What they do care about is one thing: the economics pricing, pricing, pricing. That’s where Flaskworks comes in. Flipper's theory of NICE being somehow interested in a 10 year data mark is laughable