News Focus
News Focus
icon url

WolfofMia

11/14/25 2:17 PM

#508135 RE: MayoMobile #508131

Mayo they are allowed new analysis of existing collected data.

What is not allowed is newly collected data.

The data need to be submitted was already collected a while back.

This was just an analysis.
icon url

Hoskuld

11/14/25 2:22 PM

#508141 RE: MayoMobile #508131

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/procedural-advice-re-examination-chmp-opinions_en.pdf

The applicant/MAH shall forward to the Agency the detailed grounds for the request for reexamination of the opinion. As stated in Article 62.1 paragraph 4 of Regulation 726/2004 and Article 32.4 paragraph 3 of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended, “the re-examination procedure may deal only with the points of the opinion initially identified by the applicant/MAH and may be based only on the scientific data available when the Committee adopted the initial opinion.”

The above seems pretty definitive about whether new info can be brought to bear or not. How do you read this?
icon url

Investor2014

11/14/25 2:42 PM

#508145 RE: MayoMobile #508131

Surely CHMP must have considered the OLE as a KOL according to Missling told Anavex it can replace a confirmatory trial.
icon url

ignatiusrielly35

11/14/25 2:48 PM

#508148 RE: MayoMobile #508131

Wouldn't they have been able to present new data after the initial filing to specifically address concerns raised in the LOI?