…yeah this is setting up for end of year possible explosion: name change, beta testing successfully done and onto live trading. Adding more RAW assets in the billions to the app. Cant wait!
It does not mean that at all... The first thing they do for a ticker change is check if the one requested is available, probably not even the investigator department doing it. And "on hold" can mean several different things. Including it's under investigation. Merger and ticker changes don't even work under the same rules, or departments. While both processes require FINRA oversight, they are managed through distinct rules, forms, and internal teams.
.
.
Watch your wallet
Buyer Beware Social Media Promoted Frontload Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam
More of your complete bullshit... Where have I ever said it'd never get cleared?? Or never happen?? I have always said unlikely or a good possibility it won't. There is a possibility it could get past FINRA. Doesn't mean the fraud isn't still there because it is. There is certainly over a decade of fraud, theft, regulatory non-compliance and undisclosed judgments by several fraudsters and Greg Mitchell who is still here. It also doesn't mean it still couldn't come back to bite this in the ass later. History matters to regulators and most investors.
P.S. A basher swore this would never happen, that the baggage was too heavy, that it’d never get cleared. And yet, here we are. Let that be a reminder to always do your own due diligence and tune out the noise. Most of those posts you see are designed to shake you out of your position. They want your shares, or they want you to take a loss. Don’t give them the satisfaction.
.
.
Watch your wallet
Buyer Beware Social Media Promoted Frontload Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam
A week at most ?? It could be a while yet before FINRA makes a determination of whether to process or find deficient. And PR claims FINRA "approves" corporate actions. They do not approve anything; they process corporate actions.
Looking at the timeline, the original submission seems to have gone in around Oct 28, and FINRA’s follow-up came on Nov 11. That suggests we’re down to the final stretch here, possibly days, maybe a week at most, especially if Zhang’s team turns around the updated options quickly. My guess is Xenergy’s business development arm is helping keep this one moving. Good riddance to GRLT and Grillit.
Factual information about FINRA processing corporate actions.
Be Wary of Announcements Regarding FINRA "Approval" of a Corporate Action
Companies undergoing a corporate action often issue a press release or other communication, such as a tweet or other social media post, to provide details of the change. For instance, a company might announce a new corporate name that reflects a change in product lines or business focus. However, in the past, some companies have used these publications to suggest that FINRA has somehow "approved" a corporate action or that a corporate action will be effective once FINRA approves it. To clarify, this is not the case: FINRA does not approve corporate actions.
Common Reasons FINRA Refuses to Process Corporate Actions FINRA refusals typically stem from one or more of the deficiencies below.
1. Delinquent SEC Filings or Non-Current Reporting Status
The leading cause of refusal is delinquency in SEC filings. FINRA will not process actions for issuers that are not current in reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Examples include:
Failure to file the latest Form 10-K or Form 10-Q; Registration on Form 10 or Form 8-A followed by non-filing of periodic reports; Claiming “current information” on OTC Markets without maintaining SEC compliance. FINRA’s position: No corporate action proceeds until all missing filings appear as accepted on the SEC EDGAR system.
2. Failure to Comply with Prior SEC Reporting Obligations
Even if current filings are up to date, FINRA also evaluates an issuer’s historical compliance. It may decline to process when:
A predecessor or shell entity was a delinquent SEC filer or subject to revocation; The issuer previously registered under the Exchange Act but ceased reporting; or Corporate reorganizations appear designed to obscure a prior enforcement action. FINRA interprets these patterns as attempts to evade transparency. Without documentation clarifying the corporate lineage, Rule 6490 authorizes refusal.
3. Failure to Provide Corporate Documents for Officers, Directors, and Control Changes
FINRA requires proof of a corporation’s legitimate authority. Issuers must submit:
Appointment and resignation letters for all officers and directors; Board and shareholder resolutions approving the action; Control-change agreements and stock-purchase documentation; Updated shareholder ledgers and beneficial-ownership tables. If gaps appear—missing minutes, unsigned consents, or unexplained ownership changes—FINRA may conclude that management lacks lawful authority, resulting in a refusal.
4. Incomplete or Inconsistent State Corporate Filings
FINRA cross-checks all state-level filings (e.g., amendments, mergers, or conversions). Processing stops if:
Documents are uncertified or unsigned; State filings conflict with resolutions; Multiple active entities exist under the same name; and The filing has not been accepted by the Secretary of State. Only certified, date-stamped documents establishing corporate authority will satisfy FINRA.
5. Evidence of Fraud, Manipulation, or Promotional Abuse
FINRA also refuses actions showing potential market manipulation or investor deception, such as:
Repeated or extreme reverse splits to maintain artificial prices; Social-media or newsletter promotions that are inconsistent with filings; Unauthorized share issuances or conversions; False or exaggerated press releases; or Use of an unregistered transfer agent. Suspect matters may be referred to the SEC Division of Enforcement or FINRA’s Market Regulation Department.
The Rule 6490 Review Process The process unfolds in five stages:
Submission – The issuer files a Company-Related Action Notification Form through the FINRA Gateway at least ten calendar days before the proposed effective date. Initial Review – FINRA verifies completeness and cross-checks SEC and state records. Information Requests – FINRA may request supplemental evidence (board minutes, filings, transfer-agent confirmations). Processing or Refusal – If complete, the action is published on FINRA’s Daily List; if not, a Refusal-to-Process Notice is issued citing Rule 6490(a)(5). Resubmission – The issuer may correct deficiencies and refile, but FINRA retains absolute discretion. Typical review time ranges from ten to thirty days, depending on complexity and responsiveness.
Consequences of a Refusal When FINRA refuses to process:
The corporate action is void for market purposes—no new CUSIP, ticker, or share adjustment occurs. DTC and transfer agents freeze implementation pending FINRA clearance. OTC Markets Group will not update issuer profiles or market tiers. Investor confidence and financing prospects often decline sharply. Persistent deficiencies may trigger SEC enforcement or trading suspension. A refusal is therefore not merely administrative; it can halt an issuer’s ability to raise capital or restructure.