Replies to post #225485 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[StevenDice]

Yes, There are some interesting parallels here for me with QCOM back before QCOM took off. There was real debate over time division multiplexing (TDMA) versus code division multiplexing (CDMA) which was QCOM's unproven, yet to be adopted technology. Many analysts at that time were saying that TDMA was the only answer and CDMA broke the laws of physics. They were proven wrong.
Interesting, the European telecoms went with TDMA while Sprint and a few North American telecoms went with CDMA. 
I see parallels here. CDMA was certainly not accepted nor a proven technology with many skeptics before QCOM took off.
I lean into what you're saying in that there is certainly noise in the signal.

[Fruno]

I didn't reply for 2 reasons - first, I have a life. I do other things than monitor this board all day.

Second, you asked if I know what hurdles remain for plasmonics. The question is, do you? And you say that "skepticism" about plasmonics is reasonable. The question I am asking is what is that skepticism based on? You have not provided any justification for your skepticism. I provided technical information from a patent and an opinion based on the fact that Polariton is conducting Telcordia testing on a device right now. You've provided nothing.