Replies to post #225320 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Abig]

Bunch of fools! Chasing meaningless carrots and supporting insiders graft, for decades!

And yet here you are! So who is really the fool!!!

[stocup]

Lol, bunch of fools who are about to be multi millionaires!

[x993231]

I promised the folks this morning a history lesson on your background, here it is. Pumpkin forgot to leave out that I was 100% correct on the Lumera call. And yes I didn't think the industry would stretch the performance of Silicon for so long, no more though AI and power demand is through the roof, our time has come, a fortune 500 is onboard.

So back in the day the founders of Lightwaves founders had a vision of taking a stable polymer (plastic) chromophore and making it Electro Optic active. So Perkinamine was born (as information it was born named after Sir William Perkins that invented the first commercialized synthetic dye). The operation at the time was in a single bay in an industrial park down the street from me. Lightwave needed money to operate and there was an NSF grant (I think that it was for 25 million). The purse strings for the grant were guided by Larry Dalton at the University of Washington (as information lightwave had to show Dalton the chromophore) oh and also as information Dalton had formed a company at the U of W and then spun that company off it was called Lumera it turned out that he directed 100% of that money to Lumera (he couldn't even spare 1% of that money). One of the founders reviewed the Lumera chromophore and told me “X, that Lumera polymer is totally flawed, I’m not sure how long it will take the world to figure it out but we did not get any money, they (Lumera) self dealt the entire grant”. When I found out I should have shorted LMRA but I didn’t, but what I did do was go to the Lumera Yahoo board and tell those guys what I had found out. So at the time Pumpkin was an investor there, he argued that I didn’t know what I was saying and then he rode that stock into the ground. I followed it through 1 for 8 reverse split and the BK court system in Delaware. So apparently Pumpkin thinks that somehow by me informing him of the flaws in that polymer that I cause that multimillion company to fail. Anyhow that is in fact how he learned about EO Polymers, ever since then he has been on a quest to try and force his views on this board to try and make it fail. Somewhere along the line the shorts contacted him and have hired him to post negatively.

Here is a link to a post that I wrote long ago along with the documentation from the 'Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity' on the hanky panky and in there is how to detect Lumeras flawed polymer with a pair of polarized sunglasses, and I told Pumpkin how to do, he didn't and went from the life of an investor, back to his moms basement and went to work for the shorts.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/s2a8xgggh8g8carvzxp3q/The-true-story-of-the-origins-of-the-Great-Punkin-trying-to-flip-the-script.docx?rlkey=02f9nnelnzpfdu2brha79rgtg&dl=0

The Lumera Dalton Story

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/lfi3iumukshlf6xgxz2ll/h?rlkey=4sldxdm2f7usn8anodg032t98&dl=0

If anyone told me that an effort by me to help inform someone (Punkin) invested in a company that was 100% a verifiable scam that was visible to the naked eye, that investor not listening (Pumpkin) and losing all their money would turn and post on a board for 20 years to try and hurt those that tried to help, I would not have believed it.

X In order to view those dropbox file you do not have to sign into dropbox or join it in any way.

[Fruno]

And yet you have never provided one bit of evidence to back your claims. For example, what is the evidence you have that plasmonics is years away from commercialization?

I understand that there's been too much hype, but when it comes to technical issues, you've made repeated statements about what the company can't do, but never backed any of them up.

[x993231]

Looks like I stuck a nerve Punk, you bring this on yourself, the fact of the matter is that you made a hugh public mistake and simply cannot admit it, admitting it to yourself is the first step, but then your pay checks from the shorts would stop, but you brought that on yourself.

X It is on you, truer words have never been spoken. Will you at least credit me for totally enabling your new career of advising shorts on polymers?

You said "The point was it was not happening at that time as the longs claimed"
Actually those problems were solved prior to your posts and the proof is that the patents were submitted (not public, just submitted to the Patent office) you would say they could never do this or that a year later when the patent was made public it predated your posts. True. true, good luck in life.


Oh the shorts just reported 330k shorts back up to 12.5 million, up down, down up, up down supply and demand with the shorts hanging out their rear ends.

June 13 the price was $1.25 and the shorts were at 21 Million, they covered 9 Million of them and the price moved to $6 on October 15th that is a 400% increase when they covered less than half of their shorted shares. Oh 400% increase on a $5 share is $20. It is just math.

[Mr Stock pick]

Loser