You have seen what the bad actors did with the share price without emphasis on disclosure that manufacturing and product release hurdles had to be overcome and that there was no known timeline for that. This was hinted at of course in the mandatory disclosures which is all that is required by law. Mr. Neil Woodford called that a “bump in the road”. More direct disclosure of these and other hurdles would have led to open season by short side hedge funds to trade and crush the stock over the now longer than 10 year period which would have caused bankruptcy. Preventing bankruptcy is primary and above all else fiduciary duty and Linda’s moves in this regard with silence are easily defended as what kept the company from going bankrupt while also maintaining investor control of the company. Big picture!; ). I learned long ago that investors are doing so at their own risk and that they are not entitled to all that they think they are with regard to business affairs. This is why the bears attack management because trusting management to some degree is inherent to any longer term investment decision. Traders don’t need to trust as much as they just trade shorter, fairly predictable cycles. Best wishes.