Uplisting, as a priority is not even in question in LP's strategy going forward. She hired two uplisting specialists a few years ago in preparation for what's an inevitability.
According to OTC records she hired the law firm you are talking about 9 years ago. They are listed as a securities expert, but they do note uplisting as a specialty. This message board hyped them for over 5 years as a sign they are about to uplist.
If uplisting was a priority one thing they might do is start following the governance rules set out by the National Exchanges. Minor things like allowing shareholders to vote at an ASM every year,
EDIT: We know they had them on contract 9 years ago as that was disclosed in OTC docs. They could have been much longer though. For all we know that firm handled the uplist to the London AIM, the 2nd uplist to NASDAQ and the downlist to the OTC QB.
ilovetech, Do you (does anyone) think that adding Advent into the company will give us enough revenue to get off the OTC? I always thought approval would be the catalyst, but that seems frozen in a glacier. A year and 9 months since they 'accepted' the application. Seems to me a incomprehensible amount of time when peoples' lives are at stake.
Lets hope they are not of the same caliber of the people she hired to assemble the UK MAA, which was a disaster and had to be pretty much redone by NWBO. If this was a few years ago, its no wonder why it didnt happen lol