I usually get paid for my geo-analytical work, Ate. You going to pay me?
Look, this is just a means to an end. I care more about the final product here - discovery or not. You get 10 geos with 10 different sets of experience to rate & rank targets for drilling, you often get 10 diffent lists. Interpretive geology is like that. Almost an art, vs a science, although we do use multiple fields of science in our work.
I'm not going to second guess some other bloke's (Greg Hall?) nterpretation and ranking, and they've likley spent hours or days playing with the data while I don't have time for that (and I don't have the raw data). But at a glance it makes sense. Of course Target 1 is priority 1 as it's closest to the known gold deposits..
The 2200N anomaly is their highest rated REE target. This is a ranking of their gold targets. Different criteria.
By the way, never claimed to be a wiz geo, just a geo with a lotta years mostly in gold exploration and mining.
Market Data 
Markets 
