News Focus
News Focus
icon url

NotSure2

10/18/25 10:13 AM

#793202 RE: RRP60 #793189

There is no point in making fun of them or hold them responsible



But its fine for them to call FUDSTER, or using condescending words towards anyone mentioning realistics timeline/SP...

I see how it works...

P.S these people are responsible for more SP lost than any FUDSter / MM spoofing combined. By bringing wrong monthly SP/Timelines predictions since 2020 and before. Theyll redo it again if ever we get approved, especially regarding NICE reimbursment (2-3 years at a minimum, more likely 3-4 after aproval, if ever they reimburse). NICE approval next week, month, in 6 month etc...

They did the same with special revenue, then "applies to all cancer, revenue going to be huge", etc...etc...etc... While accusing others of being FUDSter...
icon url

jesster64

10/18/25 10:21 AM

#793207 RE: RRP60 #793189

"everybody and anybody are wrong in predicting timelines for this drug. It doesnt mean they are a joke or misleading people"

I don't mind a missed timeline, yes, we all were wrong. What I mind is them continuing to miss. Or giving wildly large timeframes. "I predict 1st quarter 2026". Really going out on a limb with a 3 month prediction. Most posters have given up on timelines. Its the few that keep swinging for the fences hoping to be right one day so they can say i told you so I mind.