News Focus
News Focus
icon url

kevindenver

10/17/25 9:25 AM

#503411 RE: Investor2014 #503409

Can you provide back up to this statement Anavex actually "planned to run a confirmatory trial"?

Anavex were clearly aware of this fact over 2 years ago, when they said they planned to run a confirmatory trial in parallel with investigating regulatory approval paths - they didn’t!



I could have missed it, but I only hear you saying this, not Anavex.

THX
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

bcblbrbm

10/17/25 11:46 AM

#503444 RE: Investor2014 #503409

"I don’t see why EMA should or would set a new precedent for AD trials of lower burden of proof."
I have yet to hear rationale that would convince me otherwise. Conditional is a lock.
icon url

kevindenver

10/17/25 9:34 PM

#503511 RE: Investor2014 #503409

Still waiting... or did you lie and are spreading FUD?

Can you provide back up to this statement Anavex actually "planned to run a confirmatory trial"?

Anavex were clearly aware of this fact over 2 years ago, when they said they planned to run a confirmatory trial in parallel with investigating regulatory approval paths - they didn’t!