Can you provide back up to this statement Anavex actually "planned to run a confirmatory trial"?
Anavex were clearly aware of this fact over 2 years ago, when they said they planned to run a confirmatory trial in parallel with investigating regulatory approval paths - they didn’t!
I could have missed it, but I only hear you saying this, not Anavex.
"I don’t see why EMA should or would set a new precedent for AD trials of lower burden of proof." I have yet to hear rationale that would convince me otherwise. Conditional is a lock.
Still waiting... or did you lie and are spreading FUD?
Can you provide back up to this statement Anavex actually "planned to run a confirmatory trial"?
Anavex were clearly aware of this fact over 2 years ago, when they said they planned to run a confirmatory trial in parallel with investigating regulatory approval paths - they didn’t!