You really are an idiot.
Of course greater that 50% a scam, yet it comes down to ‘is’ or ‘isn’t’, which is 50/50. You pick one side, it will be correct or it won’t. That one outcome or the other, that’s 50% fool.
You want me to read back somewhere and somehow rather than you explain your claims that somehow section 4.3.2 (or do you mean section 9.2.2) of the JVA is cover for the $5.6M paid by Xeriant to Eco-Aero, LLC, to XTI Aircraft? No, no buddy boo, just explain ‘cause 1) you make no sense and 2) you make no sense, and 3) it sounds foolish, and 4) I don’t know what you mean, hence asking you. .
I did not say Nexboard is real. I said “here comes Nexboard.” It may be, it has so proven it is not. You prefer to conclude what you prefer is the outcome. I still recommend you go see a doctor.
Xeriant did or does own XTI stock, as XTI stock was issued to it. You’re the nut yet to explain what occurred to the issued stock. The “returned” issued stock, as you’ve claimed… yet use crickets for your explanation.
Why did XTI issue its stock to Xeriant?
Two questions for you:
1.). How is section 4.3.2 (or do you mean section 9.2.2) of the JV Agreement relevant as a place to hide $5.6M paid by Xeriant?
2.) Why did XTI issue XTI stock to Xeriant, as XTI itself claims it did?
Good luck…. Go!
Or are you again going to rely upon not answering but with your crickets? I mean it, these two questions, please explain, and explain well. thank you.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
