Replies to post #38555 on Xeriant Inc (XERI)

[StockItOut]

Work into your logic and explanation the $5.4M that Xeriant did pay to XTI. You left that key part out.

And, work into your logic and your explanation the $5.4M XTI equity debt obligation that XTI claimed it owed to Xeriant, that upon the Inpixion XTI merger and stock conversion XTIA satisfied its debt obligation to Xeriant with issuance of XTI and XTIA shares to Xeriant.


As for the court case, it’s very clear you’re not an attorney nor have the disposition for one. How do we KNOW the initially missed $1M down payment will not be brought out as an issue when all of the discovery is presented to the court, is because 1.) XTIA would have already brought it out, then wanting discovery to support their claim. Didn’t occur. Nor will it. And 2.) discovery is not presented to the court. Discovery is presented to the other side.

Quester, you just cannot give up on your fabricated pre-concluded story and your terribly faulty reasoning. Dad gum it, you’re going to make your pre-conclusion work out somehow, right? Best way is just like in religion, have your pre-conclusion then make up the story to fit it, pesky facts ignore them, treat them as irrelevant. Trrump style.

All this over the head of JohnnyDope who years for the simplicity of Canada, and in following an idiot Grifter who thinks he’s hitler-in-the-making.

.

[StockItOut]

Right, “the Company [XTI] has agreed to issue to Xeriant up to 10% of the number of shares of the Company’s [XTI’s] fully diluted issued and outstanding common stock immediately prior to the earlier of (i) the Company merging with a publicly-listed special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC” transaction) or into another entity (other than a SPAC) where the Company is valued at not less than $150 million.

Quester, did you notice that that merger happened? And that XTI issued its shares to Xeriant?

Or do you pretend these events did not occur? So your pre-conclusion can be satisfied by ignoring facts and reality.

[StockItOut]

You’ve cited where XTI says it will pay Xeriant in XTI stock upon a merger. So, why didn’t it?


It’s your claim no XTI stock was issued to Xeriant, so, why didn’t XTI issue shares to Xeriant.


If your answer is because Xeriant initially paid $310,880, and not initially paid $1M, then you really are stupid.

[Smartypants2]

There's nothing in that agreement that said XERI had to pay the initial $1 million in a single payment! XTI could have simply declared XERI in default back in the Summer of 2021 if the down payment had not been made!