Replies to post #20148 on Affluence Corp (AFFU)

[RichieBoy]

In a nutshell AFFU's White Paper wasn't directly* for investors.
It was putting there shingle out for other companies who might be interested. Acquisition candidates, industrial investors, potential new strategic partners etc. It benefits shareholders eventually, but currently that benefit is unquantifiable. Hence the market snore. 🛌💤

Thanks for the video Drew! Always appreciate assessments from a different perspective. Remind your audience to subscribe to both channels now. I nearly got Shanghaied in the commotion. 🫢

[RichieBoy]

I won't tell you how many questions I posed to AI to reach this conclusion because I can't count that high. But I hope this conclusion helps your subscribers as well as stockholders here in this Ihub forum too accurately ground their thinking on current MTi events. It won't be verbatim from AI as I will try to highlight pivotal information. Just know Drew that your videos and your postings here have helped very much to try and nail down what Mr Domingo is up to as we speak.

Anyone who wishes to rip this theory apart please be my guest. However due to time constraints don't feel I'm obliged to answer you please. Here we go then a highly abbreviated overview of the current happenings with MTI because they are very likely all material events at some stage in the near future.

On a qualitative basis, it is highly likely (estimated >70%) that the need to support and finalize MTi’s European defense integrator contracts was a key reason for the release of the white paper to the press, demonstrating technological strengths and strategic positioning necessary to fulfill contract requirements and attract investor confidence. It is also estimated these EU Defense Integrator contracts have a (40-50% chance of "new business") within the EU Defense sector.

The white paper serves as a communication tool to position Affluence Corporation and MTi as credible and capable partners within Europe’s defense ecosystem. It was probably also required at the behest of AFFU/MTi/Aerodyne Group company lawyers . Thus, the release was probably a deliberate material event linked to contract consolidation efforts, rather than solely a response to broader EU defense policy publications.

Don't take this as gosple and make special note please that I am not legally bound by this speculation. It is merely an attempt to ground the discussion on the most likeliest of events.