News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jesster64

09/27/25 11:21 AM

#790125 RE: Doc logic #790117

Sp is at .25 Doc, what harm could telling the truth do? As long as its a reasonable delay, investors will not abandon ship en masse. Legend brings up a good point. For years posters have been saying companies do no give updates after applying. Apparently that is a lie. It might not be a smart thing to do in NWBO's case, but companies do do it.
icon url

Legend431

09/27/25 11:23 AM

#790126 RE: Doc logic #790117

Linda obviously does not care about share price anyway. At this point to stop the wondering and rhetoric just be transparent. Probably the best thing Linda could do at this point is be transparent (for once)
icon url

exwannabe

09/27/25 11:29 AM

#790128 RE: Doc logic #790117

Just think for a second about your comparison. Those companies are huge and their share price wouldn’t be moved much if at all by one little bit of interim delay news about a single new product seeking approval. NWBO does not have that luxury and delays would see share price attacked aggressively. Is that what you want?; ). Best wishes.


So you assert NWBO's reason for not disclosing is that it is negative material news that would adversely affect the share price.

Agreed.
icon url

theorysuit

09/27/25 11:56 AM

#790134 RE: Doc logic #790117

Those companies are huge and their share price wouldn’t be moved much if at all by one little bit of interim delay news about a single new product seeking approval. NWBO does not have that luxury and delays would see share price attacked aggressively. Is that what you want?; ). Best wishes.



So again you agree that withholding submission delay information from shareholders in public company is for the greater good. NOTED!
icon url

AllSheWrote

09/27/25 12:05 PM

#790135 RE: Doc logic #790117

So you would rather delay the bad news? What does that accomplish for shareholders?