I have to cut Hawk05 some serious slack on this. He has routinely posted the results of his (apparently) constant research on BIEL and openly posted anything he finds of interest. In this case - if I get the gist of his posts correctly - he thinks he found something that wasn't intended to be found publicly, and since indicated the original source has been removed. He can correct me if I have missed something. He believes the company should (or will) do a PR on the item in question and hopes BIEL will do so and it will be both positive and positively received. Hawk05 has earned the benefit of the doubt.
Hawk05 doesn't suffer the delusions of grandeur most of the BIEL investors here (gamblers here?) exhibit. He found something he thinks might bring hope that his (and other's) patience might finally pay off. Nothing wrong with that IMO.
Fact, it was public Information.... And probably was removed because I pointed it out Most likely a slip up I really don't care who believes me or not. The ones that know me well enough will know what to take from my message. None of it guarantee success but it's definitely a positive sign. I have pictures to prove that it was public information so I'm not worried.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
