News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Doc logic

08/24/25 1:01 AM

#783238 RE: exwannabe #783200

exwannabe,

The reason for the hold was obviously not required to be reported as material news as no challenge has ever been overcome in that regard. By the way, good news of a certain type does not need to be reported and as you recall, Linda said good news was turned into bad; ).
I have said that management knows how to use forward looking statements as leverage against the work of those trying to take them down. I have also said that is not the way our family does business even though I understand NWBO felt the need to do so and that the forward looking statements clause gives them legal cover which is why it’s always investor beware of forward looking statements. Best wishes.
icon url

biosectinvestor

08/24/25 9:04 AM

#783255 RE: exwannabe #783200

It was not a full halt, it was not a safety halt, it was a “partial halt” and the only thing affected was the placebo arm, and given that it was already a crossover, it was not what shorts made it out to be.

And the fact was, the company ultimately did disclose it, but they might have been in negotiations with regulators as to the meaning and process when AF got hold of confidential information. The more meaningful question is how did AF get made aware of the confidential information before it was disclosed?