News Focus
News Focus
icon url

StockItOut

08/23/25 8:54 PM

#38333 RE: quester614 #38332

You claimed I stated something I never stated or implied.

Just another diversion from you actually supporting your many many false claims that you’ve made here over the years, claims you leave crickets to explain (chirp…. chirp…) for you, or eventually your wildly inaccurate claims.

You’re right. Each state decides its manner it wants to conduct its elections.

Mail in ballots? Yeah, ok, mail in ballots is the only manner in which the State of Oregon conducts its elections. No one’s claiming fraud in Oregon. No crazy Rebs, no reactionary Dems. In fact, they tout the lack of fraud and efficiency. But you know (lol) all this… right… …. chirp… chirp…?

.
icon url

StockItOut

08/23/25 9:01 PM

#38334 RE: quester614 #38332

I do know you support one of the biggest grifts going! Orange you going to agree? lol
icon url

StockItOut

08/23/25 11:33 PM

#38335 RE: quester614 #38332

I think we did this before, but OK, round n round you want it to go,

Let’s assume: “XERI who never had possession of any XTI Stock,” as you claim.

Where’d those XTIA shares go?

I think when we did this before you confused yourself with your reply, when you announced in partial conclusion that the XTIA shares were “returned.”

* If issued but Xeriant has never been in possession, where’d the shares go?

and

* If issued and returned,

1.) where’d the shares go?; returned to where?…, and

2.) where located and which company filing(s) (from XTIA, XTI, or XERI) states what you claim, that issued XTIA shares were “returned”?


3.) That, over and over again and both, you have never, and you don’t ever explain ...

… except… (you know the drilll… kids…. … drum roll please…) … by your ‘chirp chirp’ crickets… … … chirp… … … … … chirp… chirp…


.