Flipper has been posting that BS for a while. He started with that as a metric for MHRA approval then changed his tactic quickly once he realized how stup** it was to then pivot towards NICE evidence. Even that is just pure BS. If NICE is not convinced with 9 year survival data, adding another year is not going to change the outcome.
He has been BSing for well over a decade coming up with all kinds of excuses to recruit bag holders. If folks listened to his commentary, they would have lost 95% during the golden decade of stock return.
As we have waited what feels like forever imo they should PR what the 9 year survival data shows. In no way do you or I want to wait on 10 year data but should have 9 year data in hand so just tell us about it