News Focus
News Focus
icon url

skitahoe

08/12/25 4:12 PM

#780966 RE: barnstormer #780963

The problem is still the EDEN, until it's approved to manufacture our vaccine the company doesn't have a commercial production facility that an inspection team would say could meet the needs if the FDA approved.

The inspection of the commercial production facility is a part of a BLA filing, we may use contractors to make the vaccine but it must be done with equipment they'll approve. The UK accepted the 20 tiny cleanrooms as meeting that requirement, they could submit to the FDA proposing the same, but I believe they know they'd be turned down. The company won't say it, but their actions speak louder than their words.

Gary
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Slave1

08/12/25 4:19 PM

#780972 RE: barnstormer #780963

No one’s denying that 601 days is a long time. But that’s exactly why we’re here, because the risk–reward is enormous. We’ve seen ample evidence that they’ve been working hard this entire time: building a regulatory framework, collaborating with top academic centers, securing ironclad IP, and establishing a manufacturing process that’s first in class. They already have a GMP-certified facility up and running. They are literally prepared for touchdown.

It’s also important to remember that remaining silent during the MHRA review is standard practice. When you’re in the middle of a first-in-class, process-defined, tissue-agnostic approval, regulators are setting precedent. Any misstep, even an innocently worded update, can cause delays by breaching confidentiality, creating inconsistencies between submissions and public statements, or signaling outcomes prematurely. That’s why companies go quiet until the decision is final.

This wait hasn’t been idle. In the background, they’ve expanded their patent portfolio, scaled manufacturing capacity, validated their method in academic settings, and aligned their operations with frameworks like SI 87 so approvals can cascade internationally. Every one of those steps has been done with the endgame in mind.

The frustration is on our side, not theirs. That’s why I keep posting, to remind people how rare this company is. If we leave the conversation empty, it gets filled by people who want to see the company fail. I understand it’s hard to hold onto that perspective when the stock price keeps sliding, but price right now is about sentiment, not science or readiness. I completely tune out the day-to-day moves. The only number that matters to me is the one after approval. If it drops to 15 cents before then, I’ll just buy more. That’s the truth.

And with my birthday falling exactly on this year’s 10-Q filing deadline, I wouldn’t mind if the next chapter in this story lands as a candle on the cake.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Zadie420

08/12/25 4:35 PM

#780979 RE: barnstormer #780963

$2 per share BO really looks good now. Apperently LP have no other gem in her pocket to stabilize the pps. If this approval takes another 3-4 months then we are talking about 10-15 cents pps. Unfortunately still people here is protecting her at any cause. I want a BO so I don't have to deal with this crap days in and days out. MMs are laughing their ass off on how she is running the company. They already made a killing. So what at the end they give up $1 bil as a settlement. All this shit is on her.