Replies to post #220745 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[pochemunyet]

Somebody please help; I need to find a garbage stock selling for very little. I won't buy, of course.

But then I will start posting derogatory messages multiple times a day on various websites, day after day, month after month, for years.

That will fulfill my life.

[x993231]

I can explain, I'm sure that he is too embarrassed. So back in the day the founders of Lightwave had a vision of taking a stable chromophore and making it EO active. So Perkinamine was born (as information it was born named after Sir William Perkins that invented the first commercialized synthetic dye). The operation at the time was in a single bay in an industrial park down the street. So Lightwave needed money and there was an NSF grant (I think that it was for 25 million). The purse strings for the grant were guided by Larry Dalton at the University of Washington (as information lightwave had to show Dalton the chromophore) oh and also as information Dalton had formed a company at the U of W and then spun that company off it was called Lumera it turned out that he directed 100% of that money to Lumera (he couldn't even spare 1% of that money). One of the founders reviewed the Lumera chromophore and told me “X that Lumera polymer is totally flawed, I’m not sure how long it will take the world to figure it out but they got the entire grant”. When I found out I should have shorted LMRA but I didn’t, but what I did do was go to the Lumera Yahoo board and tell those guys what I had found out. So at the time Pumpkin was an investor there, he argued that I didn’t know what I was saying and then he rode that stock into the ground. I followed it through the BK court system in Delaware. So apparently Pumpkin thinks that somehow by me informing him of the flaws in that polymer that I cause that multimillion company to fail. Anyhow that is how he learned about EO Polymers, ever since then he has been on a quest to try and force his views on this board to try and make it fail. Somewhere along the line the shorts contacted him and have hired him to post negatively.

Here is a link to a post that I wrote long ago along with the documentation from the 'Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity' on the hanky panky and in there is how to detect a flawed polymer with a pair of polarized sunglasses.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/s2a8xgggh8g8carvzxp3q/The-true-story-of-the-origins-of-the-Great-Punkin-trying-to-flip-the-script.docx?rlkey=02f9nnelnzpfdu2brha79rgtg&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/lfi3iumukshlf6xgxz2ll/h?rlkey=4sldxdm2f7usn8anodg032t98&dl=0

If anyone told me that an effort to help inform someone invested in a company that was 100% a verifiable scam that was visible to the naked eye, that investor not listening (Pumpkin) and losing all their money would turn and post on a board for 20 years to try and hurt those that tried to help, I would not have believed it.

X Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.