News Focus
News Focus
icon url

FeMike

07/25/25 12:38 PM

#777933 RE: Slave1 #777931

AI is not good at handling quotes so I'm identifying where the facts were taken from manually. Conclusion is still the same



The conclusion is not the same, stop.

The company definitively stating that they are, as a matter of fact, being reviewed under the 150 day accelerated review pathway is EXTREMELY and IMPORTANTLY different from the company stating that they requested the accelerated review but cannot confirm that they are actually being reviewed under said pathway. Facts were not taken from anywhere, as it is not a known fact that they are being reviewed under the 150 day pathway, and it is almost certainly actually not the case.

Just admit that, once again, you did not do your own due diligence, you trusted AI because you aren't smart enough to do this on your own, and you posted inaccurate information.
icon url

exwannabe

07/25/25 12:39 PM

#777935 RE: Slave1 #777931

AI is not good at handling quotes so I'm identifying where the facts were taken from manually. Conclusion is still the same


No. The conclusion is not the same.

Both you and AC asserted that NWBO stated as a fact the MAA was being reviewed under the 150 day process. And per the actual quotes, NWBO says they do not have confirmation.