News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jaiguruji7

07/25/25 5:17 AM

#364367 RE: Krombacher #364365

Things that will cause FORCED naked short squeeze:

1) DBMM buyout or merger into another company, this if it happens is far down the road, when DBMM is making several millions in revenue and their revenue and earning growth is consistently increasing every quarter, even though it is little by little. Slow process, will probably take several years and the naked shorts and their minons will keep manipulating the DBMM sp with misinformation/disinformation/lies as they do today and everyday and it will go nowhere and will probably stay in the subpennies or trips, the shareholders will get frustrated and move on (which is what the naked shorts want).

2) The prefferred share dividend, as mentioned by Krombacher, i hope Linda considers it and acts upon it quickly the best option.,

3) Alpine is kicked out by Finra, and they file bankruptcy, since Alpine and Kramers cannot cover the large naked short, as they don't have funds, they will probably file bankruptcy and walk away, and DTCC will have to cover at market prices, this will cause a forced squeeze. We don't know the status of the Alpine case.

4) Some other legal action that Linda / Reggie take against Kramers/Alpine to cause a naked short covering.

5) Some other tricks that Linda has in mind and waiting to act upon which we may not know about.


As Krombacher mentioned the naked shorts and minions will continue to damage the company and its share price as they are doing every day, even though DBMM keeps consistently increasing their revenues in millions each quarter. With the result DBMM revenues and earnings will grow, but the share price will keep eroding or will fluctuate in the sub-penny or triple zero range and will frustrate existing and new share holders, causing them to move on which is what the naked shorts and their minions want. When the shareholders leave out of frustration it will cause a sp plunge, which is what the naked shorts and their minions want.

This is JMHO


Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Jetmek_03052

07/25/25 7:58 AM

#364369 RE: Krombacher #364365

When I pointed out the wording change in DBMM's last quarterly, about the $1M "revenue" promise being quoted as a "contractual" amount? I was not suggesting that there would be an ACTUAL contract amount for that figure!

FAR from it.

Let's be clear here. What I am almost certain will happen is that an announcement of some sort of contract will be made - but it won't ACTUALLY EXIST! It will be a promise like all the other promises of wonderful things. Just like the $1M in REVENUE that was made earlier by Linda and Reggie. Just like the Irvine "partnership" was going to add clients and revenue....just like the 1ovmany "partnership" was going to boost revenue and clients. We keep seeing these grand statements STILL, in the financials and in Poo's posts - about how wonderful they are. Only problem is? The ACTUAL REVENUE NUMBERS do NOT reflect the hype! The revenue numbers keep DECREASING, not increasing!

And IF there is some sort of contractual announcement made in the next 5 weeks? It will be the SAME type of hype. It will have no substance. Probably will be announced and then not heard of until much later - where it will likely be announced as a failed venture. I'll bet not a single DOLLAR is seen from any "contractual announcement". IF DBMM does come out with some sort of announcement, it is simply contrived to BAIL OUT Linda and Reggie from their INANE revenue promise for Fiscal 2025!

You are delusional. There's no "naked short" position and Linda won't do a dividend payment because she knows it might actually show there isn't one. It will drive this share price into the abyss if that happens.

You are leading people down the primrose path with all your theories.
Bearish
Bearish