Replies to post #363977 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Stock_Barber]

How much are you down since you first posted here that you were buying shares 💩? About 75% by my calculations...

Anyone who would listen to your pumping here is a glutton for punishment!

"I'm glad that I bought DBMM so much higher!" said no one...

[Jetmek_03052]

Poo, you are FOS!

The financial statements which are reviewed and approved state the final $81,667 is accurate , not your disinformation.

A component number understated that was not in Financial Statement is frankly irrelevant .

It's RIGHT THERE on Page 14! The figures give the 9-month revenue for the US ($20,340) and the 9-month revenue for GB ($51,327). Then it says "Total Revenue" and it lists a number - $81,667! Those two revenue numbers DO NOT ADD UP TO $81,667! They add up to $71,667!

Do you deny this????

Are you saying that one of the rev totals (US or GB) was understated? If so, how in the WORLD would you know that???? Have a little inside information do we??? Eh??

You are not doing yourself any favors here!

[Jetmek_03052]

LOLOL!

“To our shareholders, we say this with confidence, while near-term revenues reflect shedding the outdated skin of the past, we are carefully primed for significant upside. “

No one believes the crap that comes out in those updates Poo!

[Jetmek_03052]

So Poo -

“To our shareholders, we say this with confidence, while near-term revenues reflect shedding the outdated skin of the past, we are carefully primed for significant upside. “

So it's true? Digital Clarity's Great Britain revenues have cratered to almost nothing? The 2nd Q published numbers state a 6-month revenue total of $48,822 and the 3rd Q published numbers state a 9-month revenue total of $51,327. This CLEARLY indicates that Digital Clarity's Great Britain clients only produced a revenue income of $2,505 for March, April and May! Is this a misprint Poo? Or is it the true income?

Let's just postulate about your comment regarding a component number being understated -

"A component number understated that was not in Financial Statement is frankly irrelevant ."

We know that the two 9-month numbers (US and GB revenue) stated on page 14 of the latest Q add up to $71,667, and NOT the $81,667 stated as the total. Using simple math, we can also see that the number for the 3 month total revs (Mar-Apr-May) of $25,090 doesn't add up either - not if the US had $12,585 and GB had only $2,505 for those 3 months. Then the total 3-month revs should be $15,090, NOT $25,090 as stated.

So there's the $10K error. Your comment about a "component number" being "understated" looks like it might pertain to the GB income. So, let's say that we add that $10K to the GB income, making it $12,505 instead of $2,505. That change would cure up all the numbers errors.

Except that would mean that the GB income was nearly HALVED between quarters. It would indicate a serious loss of income/client loss.

Wow. So, what happened to all that GB income Poo????

Poo, how can you POSSIBLY be standing by your claims that 2025 will be the "best year ever" for DBMM?

How can Linda and Reggie POSSIBLY be standing by their $1M revenue prediction for fiscal 2025, considering that the revenue total for the first 9 months of the year barely totals $82K, leaving a more than $918K shortfall to be made up in just the 4th quarter?? And now the end of the 4th quarter is only 6 weeks away, and there has not been a single announcement of any new client signings (more revenue) to DATE!

How can DBMM POSSIBLY still be making this $1M prediction, in light of all these FACTS????

Any comment POO???????????

Let's just see you post it again. Come on....you can do it!

LMFAO!