Replies to post #363916 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[johnydollar]

Thanks for posting the update poo28........

[Krombacher]

While today’s update may on the surface appear to avoid addressing a preferred share dividend, that omission may be precisely the clue. Before anything official can be said, Board approval must come first — and that’s likely where we are in the process.

Let’s be clear: once Linda presents a preferred dividend proposal to the board, the clock starts ticking — and the shorts are toast. Why?

Because a well-structured preferred dividend:

Can’t be borrowed electronically

Exposes phantom shares

Forces physical delivery, flushing out naked short positions like termites in the walls.


So the only real question now is:
🕰 How long will it take the Board to approve it once Linda lays it down?

If they do, expect a firestorm. If they delay, it may be to strategically time the detonation. Either way, the mechanism is already well understood, and the moment it goes live, we’ll know exactly why DBMM kept quiet — because they were letting the fuse burn quietly.

Stay tuned.

Krombacher

[Idiot Mayor]

Everything still on track to make $1 million in revenue? Are we going to have “the best year in history”? What are the high priced, SEC- approved “advisors” saying about it?

WRITTEN statements were made to shareholder assuring them of definite expectations.

Poo, say these words and ONLY these words - “I was wrong. I apologize.” This might be the only company that indirectly references opinions found on a message board as a reason for failure in its updates…. What a joke. And whoever (side-eye, side-head nod Poo) wrote it is a joke. Just do the shareholders a favor and just release the numbers without writing all the stupid bullshit.

“we are executing longer-term, highly remunerative contracts with clients” - did you REALLY write that? So, it’s an official statement. “ARE EXECUTING”…. Not “hope to”, “expect to”, “set a goal for” - but “ARE”. Words matter, Poo. You will find out soon enough. “Remunerative” means “financially rewarding” or “lucrative”. List the contracts (“remunerative” or otherwise). List the clients. If there are none - this would be a 100% false statement made in an official company update and should be reported to the SEC as such.

The BEST part of what you wrote was the question mark at the end of the signature….😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Shareholders are ALSO asking whether management actually has a pulse and is involved with this company other than to scam shareholders.

And the guy who’s desperately trying to orchestrate a pump reassures the sheep by saying, “the fact that something isn’t even mentioned is the very clue proving that it’s coming”….🙄🙄🙄😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

What……
A….
Total…
Train…..
Wreck…..

🚂 🔥

[Jetmek_03052]

Hey Poo-

Proofread your work before publishing it!

Is Reggie part of that update or not?

The update is signed "Linda Perry & Reggie James?"

What's with the question mark?

And you have to fix the figures in the revenue section of this financial. The Total Revs column DOES NOT JIVE with the sum of the US and Great Britain revenue figures for the 9 months ending May 31! It's $10K too high!

Hahahahaha!

Jeez - You can't even add correctly!!

LMAO!

Get it correct for a change!

[Capt Caveman]

Exciting times ahead for the
Company and its shareholders---

DBMM

[Jimmy Joe]

Thanks Poo28.

[Stock_Barber]

168,000,000 shares have been added here since you showed up and were screaming "No dilution since 2016"!

I note you don't seem to be making that claim anymore...

DBMM is a failed business almost entirely funded with debt and dilution!

I know... it takes a long time to turn the yacht around, right?

[JMMatthews]

Great update

DBOOMM $$$