To SSC — Still Dodging, Still Projecting:
You say “goodbye to logic,” yet ignore verifiable legal documents that confirm the gag order’s existence. Let me walk you through it — slowly:
The 400+ pages of court records explicitly reference the gag order.
ERHC’s own rebuttal to the SEC cited the gag order as a constraint.
And most telling of all: the SEC adjudicator ordered the SEC Division to respond to the gag order because it must be addressed. That’s a legal directive — not speculation.
You pretend this is fantasy because it threatens your fragile narrative. But real due diligence doesn’t cherry-pick facts just to win message board points.
Meanwhile, you keep parroting “ERHC is dark,” while completely ignoring the PPP loan, which required certification of substantial revenue — likely at least $1.6 million annually given the amount. That’s not from me — that’s based on public PPP guidelines. But I get it — that would undermine your illusion that ERHC is inactive.
You accuse me of desperation, delusion, and hubris — but those are just words to mask the fact that you have no rebuttal to the actual facts.
You’re right about one thing though: “Keep watching.”
Because when this flips — and it will — you’ll either learn something, or wish you had.
Krombacher