News Focus
News Focus
Followers 77
Posts 17413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2007

Re: ssc post# 365422

Saturday, 07/12/2025 12:36:36 PM

Saturday, July 12, 2025 12:36:36 PM

Post# of 367195
To SSC — Still Dodging, Still Projecting:

You say “goodbye to logic,” yet ignore verifiable legal documents that confirm the gag order’s existence. Let me walk you through it — slowly:

The 400+ pages of court records explicitly reference the gag order.

ERHC’s own rebuttal to the SEC cited the gag order as a constraint.

And most telling of all: the SEC adjudicator ordered the SEC Division to respond to the gag order because it must be addressed. That’s a legal directive — not speculation.


You pretend this is fantasy because it threatens your fragile narrative. But real due diligence doesn’t cherry-pick facts just to win message board points.

Meanwhile, you keep parroting “ERHC is dark,” while completely ignoring the PPP loan, which required certification of substantial revenue — likely at least $1.6 million annually given the amount. That’s not from me — that’s based on public PPP guidelines. But I get it — that would undermine your illusion that ERHC is inactive.

You accuse me of desperation, delusion, and hubris — but those are just words to mask the fact that you have no rebuttal to the actual facts.

You’re right about one thing though: “Keep watching.”
Because when this flips — and it will — you’ll either learn something, or wish you had.

Krombacher
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y