News Focus
News Focus
icon url

georgebailey

07/11/25 3:18 PM

#775401 RE: beartrap12 #775395

Good thinking Beartrap. Im trying to suppress my bias but based on the acquisition strategy by Merck , and the absence of public info on any relationship b/w Merck/ Mayo it seems that Merck is building treatment layers on top of NWBO's platform. So I'm not sure we are looking at Partnership with Merck but a licensing relationship with Merck.
icon url

Slave1

07/11/25 3:29 PM

#775406 RE: beartrap12 #775395

Beartrap12,

Yes, given that the patent covering the pooled lysate and autologous dendritic cell method has been identified and is exclusively licensed to NWBO, the most reasonable explanation is that Merck is not trying to sidestep NWBO, but is likely operating within academic or exploratory boundaries for now.

The trials in question, run at Roswell Park and possibly Mayo Clinic, are structurally very similar to what NWBO owns. They combine dendritic cells with pooled tumor lysate and in some cases are paired with Keytruda. If these trials are using the patented process, Merck would not be able to commercialize the results without NWBO’s involvement or permission.

So the interpretation that makes the most legal and strategic sense is this. Merck is either conducting these trials under academic safe harbor protections or is laying the groundwork for a potential partnership. They are not acting independently to compete. NWBO holds the legal IP position and it has already made clear that it controls the platform under license. That positions NWBO as the gatekeeper for any future commercial development that emerges from these studies.

In other words, it is not about Merck getting ahead of NWBO. It is more likely about Merck staying close enough to be ready if NWBO’s platform moves forward. Based on everything we know, NWBO has the leverage.

Thanks, and you do the same!
Bullish
Bullish